Writing a Brief Bio

 

One of the tasks I am finishing off is creating a brief bio for a book chapter I have just completed. Our edited collection, Planetary Praxis & Pedagogy: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Environmental Sustainability, will come out this summer and I am looking forward to using some of the chapters in my teaching next year.

While I am writing this short bio, what strikes me is my experience with narrative research and how autobiographies (a method I have been working with over the last 10+ years) implicate others in the stories we tell about ourselves – our histories. And while we often think that we are just telling our story, we are in fact telling many stories that interlock and co-construct not just our identities, but also those of the people around us. This interlocking of stories, and identities reminds me of when I was recently asked about my research for this chapter and why I thought I was the right person to undertake it. Here are my points for why this research, why now, why me and how stories are about relationships:

  • As an Environmental Educator, I recognize that all of our Environmental Education efforts need to be focused on restructuring more equitable relationships with each other and the world around us
  • We must critically engage with the relations we have in order to understand our own privilege, and how we might work as allies for social and environmental justice
  • As an educator, I am motivated to include community knowledge into my courses. Yet I am very mindful that people in positions of power and privilege must begin our own process of critical awareness, where we remap history in order to understand how we are implicated in the ongoing legacy of colonization at the root of processes of marginalization. Our goal must be to reestablish more equitable relations and I believe that those in positions of power must listen to those always already speaking, because we have much work to do at reconciliation and this begins by, what Julie Cruikshank (2006) describes as, listening closely. That work must be the stuff that educators engage, and as educators we must make this work central to our curricular and pedagogical efforts.

When I reflect on my research for this chapter, I realize that there is so much work to be done so that social justice and environmental justice issues can focus on local issues and be discussed in our classes. I remember my own experience as a student having discussions about social and environmental justice, but the focus was on other places, other counties. I now wonder if educators “feel safe” discussing race, ethnicity, religion, ability and sexuality as an issue for another place – not Canada and not right here (I think of the work by Thobani (2007). Exalted Subjects: Studies of Race and Nation in Canada). My chapter for Planetary Praxis & Pedagogy: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Environmental Sustainability, discusses how I have begun the work of discussing race in a local environmental justice issue, and I recognize that I have only just begun unraveling my own history, relations and mis-education. My hope with this chapter is that it contributes to the discussion among environmental educators who are also struggling, examining and (in Freud’s terms) “working through” the difficult knowledge (Pitt and Britzman, 2003) Others’ stories present and how to relate and engage with the world around us in more equitable ways.

Pariss Garramone

Field Notes and Notes From the Field

 

I am in the midst of preparing my lecture for the Introduction to Natural History course that I am teaching this term. For this course, I have created a very interdisciplinary approach: field observations and patterns in nature are combined with the history of collecting and then we connect this with Natural History museums, and their colonial legacy. The focus is on observing, interpreting, naming, collecting and displaying.

When I began working on this course I returned to all of the courses that I did in both my Biology and Anthropology degrees. The work I did in Biology certainly has helped me with developing the sections on fieldwork and nature observation. I am in the process of returning to many of the field notebooks I have from my field biology courses (Old Growth Forests in Temegami, Ontario and Alpine Biology in Kananaskis Alberta) and the Ornithological research I worked on in Oregon and Alaska.

Surprisingly, what has been so helpful during my preparation for this class is the work I did in Anthropology. I know it sounds strange – but it was during my degree in Cultural Anthropology at McMaster University where I first took a course with Dr. Harvey Feit on Environmental Anthropology. Now, I had taken many courses with Dr. Feit (and also Dr. Wayne Warry) on Applied Anthropology that focused on decolonizing and social justice work with the James Bay Cree, and in particular Aboriginal Sovereign Rights to land. The Environmental Anthropology course and so many of my courses that focused on Aboriginal Sovereign Rights, helped me to understand the horrific colonial legacy and logic of silencing, collecting and displaying the Other. The discussions in these courses also introduced me to the idea of doing research with communities and the concept of decolonization. Until my work in Dr. Feit’s courses, I had never thought about the importance of documentation for a community, and the power that it could hold when used by the community to fight for land rights (based on his work with the Cree, Dr. Feit’s testimony in 1973 helped to secure Cree land rights in face of the Quebec Hydro Dam, see: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19730510&id=WJouAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oKEFAAAAIBAJ&pg=847,3078175).

Not only has my work in Anthropology helped me make links to how rights to land and identity are connected, it mapped race onto space, and linked social and environmental justice. I don’t think I had ever directly connected my work in Anthropology to my understanding of environmental justice and the role of researchers working as allies with communities. Those important courses helped me to understand the political struggles over Aboriginal Sovereign Rights, and I don’t think I could have come to understand the importance of stories for understanding and linking people to place without such a politically important connection that was happening in Ontario.

I also just came across the Aanischaaukamikw Cree Cultural Institute’s blog that mentions how Dr. Feit has donated the field notes that he complied with Cree trappers and hunters over the last 40 years. (See the following link: http://aanischaaukamikw.blogspot.ca/2014/09/dr-harvey-feit-donates-hunters-diaries.html). This is a great example of research with a community, both for how this work established Aboriginal Sovereign Rights, but also because it demonstrates what returning research to a community looks like in practice, and how actions and commitments can return research stories to a community. This is something I am going to be using with my class when we examine being an ally in decolonizing research and the process of reconciliation.

Pariss Garramone